Author Topic: gt turbo 0-60?  (Read 2282 times)

tobyfisher1990

  • 150BHP Member
  • **
  • Posts: 25
    • View Profile
gt turbo 0-60?
« on: 00:53, Wed 28 January 2009 »
hiya i was just wandering what the 0-60 on a gt turbo should be?
because i wanna no if any thing has been done to mine  :?

cheers toby

5teve L

  • Global Moderator
  • 200BHP Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3540
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #1 on: 07:39, Wed 28 January 2009 »
7.2 secs springs to mind... not 100% sure on that though.

5teve L

  • Global Moderator
  • 200BHP Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3540
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #2 on: 07:40, Wed 28 January 2009 »
Here you go, i was a tenth out....
http://www.renault5gtturbo.com/performance.htm

jure

  • 200BHP Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1465
    • View Profile
    • http://www.renault-klub.hr
(No subject)
« Reply #3 on: 09:08, Wed 28 January 2009 »
7.3 is most common data. There is official UK commercial showing 7.5 while some even say that GTT has "only" 8 sec from 0-100 km/h.

JK

  • 200BHP Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 269
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #4 on: 09:35, Wed 28 January 2009 »
phase 1 0-62 7.1 sec, pahse 2 7.6 :shock: , so wikipedia reckons.  :wink:
I got 5 on it..

tobyfisher1990

  • 150BHP Member
  • **
  • Posts: 25
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #5 on: 09:49, Wed 28 January 2009 »
cheers boys
helps alot

jure

  • 200BHP Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1465
    • View Profile
    • http://www.renault-klub.hr
(No subject)
« Reply #6 on: 07:13, Thu 29 January 2009 »
Quote from: "JK"
phase 1 0-62 7.1 sec, pahse 2 7.6 :shock: , so wikipedia reckons.  :wink:


I know that PH1 was faster due to little different jetting in the carb and 0.70 instead of 0.65 bars of boost.

pebbles

  • 170BHP Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 83
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #7 on: 08:09, Thu 29 January 2009 »
wonder why my standard PH2 felt quicker than my standard PH1 ??  :shock:

BriC

  • 200BHP Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 444
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #8 on: 17:09, Thu 29 January 2009 »
Quote from: "jure"
Quote from: "JK"
phase 1 0-62 7.1 sec, pahse 2 7.6 :shock: , so wikipedia reckons.  :wink:

I know that PH1 was faster due to little different jetting in the carb and 0.70 instead of 0.65 bars of boost.


The Phase 1 only had 115BHP and the Phase 2 had 120BHP, so I don't think it's down to power. I thought it was because the Phase 1 weighed less?

gjb0535

  • 170BHP Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 149
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #9 on: 17:55, Thu 29 January 2009 »
phase 1 = 820kg
phase 2 = 855kg

source

www.carfolio.com