Author Topic: 350bhp R5 ?  (Read 7005 times)

jure

  • 200BHP Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1465
    • View Profile
    • http://www.renault-klub.hr
(No subject)
« Reply #15 on: 20:22, Mon 10 September 2007 »
I would say too long. Don't disappear again :x

chris tur-bo

  • 200BHP Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 519
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #16 on: 08:48, Tue 11 September 2007 »
I will try not to.

Im looking into getting another 5.
Turbo pea.
Renault fives break to much. Thats why i now own a supra

jure

  • 200BHP Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1465
    • View Profile
    • http://www.renault-klub.hr
(No subject)
« Reply #17 on: 12:40, Tue 11 September 2007 »
Nice to hear that.

Get one ASAP :)

Hafis

  • 170BHP Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 89
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #18 on: 22:10, Tue 11 September 2007 »
Well as i know he has the head from r5 alpine (non-turbo) and baby that shit revs like hell. So with good  setup and nice revs and big turbo why not 300 hp. But we hav a guy in Slovenia has a honda wit 2,0l n/a motor with 260 hp and he drives low 12

ben 5

  • 200BHP Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 155
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #19 on: 19:39, Wed 12 September 2007 »
if that was true he would be in the 11s no prob
one careful lady owner
never raced or rallied!

jure

  • 200BHP Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1465
    • View Profile
    • http://www.renault-klub.hr
(No subject)
« Reply #20 on: 23:34, Wed 12 September 2007 »
I must correct you Hafis. He doesn't have alpine head but he revs his car very high. Think around 7500 rpm.

Hondas are different thing. They go for low weight not horsepower.

Hafis

  • 170BHP Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 89
    • View Profile
(No subject)
« Reply #21 on: 20:07, Mon 17 September 2007 »
Dunno really, i know i saw a 5 with that comversion, i thought it was this one...